a builder's codex
codex · operators · Christoph Janz · ins_five-animals-of-saas

You can't hunt elephants the way you hunt rabbits — pick your animal first, GTM follows

By Christoph Janz · General Partner & Co-founder Point Nine Capital · 2026-03-03 · essay · Five Ways to Build a $100M SaaS Business

Tier A · TL;DR
You can't hunt elephants the way you hunt rabbits — pick your animal first, GTM follows

Claim

There are five viable paths to $100M ARR, defined by the combination of average revenue per account and number of customers. Flies ($10/yr × 10M), Mice ($100/yr × 1M), Rabbits ($1k/yr × 100k), Deer ($10k/yr × 10k), Elephants ($100k+/yr × 1k). The animal you hunt determines GTM architecture, hiring profile, marketing channels, and product complexity. The mistake is choosing tactics before choosing the animal.

Mechanism

Each animal type carries an entire operating model. Flies need viral consumer-grade acquisition; you cannot field-sell a $10/yr product. Elephants need solution-selling field reps; you cannot self-serve a $100k contract. The arithmetic is simple but the strategic implication is severe: a misaligned ARPA → GTM combination wastes the runway. Janz's portfolio companies have used the framework as a migration tool too — Rabbits going upmarket to Deer to Elephants when they hit growth ceilings.

Conditions

Holds when:

Fails when:

Evidence

"Flies generate $10/year per customer and need 10 million of them; Mice generate $100/year and need 1 million; Rabbits generate $1,000/year and need 100,000; Deer generate $10,000/year and need 10,000; Elephants generate $100,000+/year and need 1,000."

"You cannot hunt elephants the way you hunt rabbits."

— Christoph Janz (synthesized from operator's published work)

Signals

Counter-evidence

PLG-led companies (Notion, Figma) deliberately straddle Mice and Deer simultaneously — the framework's clean ARPA tiers don't capture the multi-segment reality of bottom-up SaaS.

Cross-references

Open the interactive view → View original source → Markdown source →